Chapter 12. Learning from the crisis
References [
CPB |
General |
Scientific ]
Summary
Authors
Casper van Ewijk & Coen Teulings
Contact:
Coen Teulings
In this chapter
References
CPB
General
Scientific
Summary
This final chapter draws some lessons from the credit crisis. To start with,
it argues that the crisis concerns the banking sector, and not the
functioning of the system in general. Furthermore, the crisis is an economic
crisis and not a moral one. More accurately, economists and policymakers seem
to have put too much trust in the reputation mechanism in preventing
opportunistic behaviour. Economic theory provides several reasons why this
mechanism may fail in the banking sector and during crises, in particular.
This calls for adequate regulation and a stronger position of the government
vis-à-vis the shareholders in case of bank failures.
This is not to say that shareholders have contributed to the onset of the
crisis. On the contrary, it is a misperception that shareholders' interests
are short-term in nature and therefore at variance with the long-term thrust
of the firm. One has to be suspicious therefore of proposals to limit the
influence of shareholders. Similarly, international financial integration is
not to blame for the crisis. Shocks to the economic system are inevitable,
diversification of such shocks on a worldwide scale is a prerequisite to
growth in the long run. Tentative simulations by Maurice Obstfeld indicate
that international financial integration can increase average growth from 1.7
to 2 percent per year, corresponding to a welfare gain of 30 percent. A final
lesson is that our institutions should be better geared towards risks and in
particular towards rare - and therefore easily forgotten - catastrophic
events like the Great Recession.
Up